One of the challenges among scientists is describing the work they do in language the rest of us can understand. That's the idea behind a new program at the University of Tennessee that uses music to bridge that communication gap.
The National Institute for Mathematical and Biological Synthesis, or NIMBioS, isn't a place for intellectual lightweights. The whiteboards are tagged with the frenetic graffiti of advanced math, and the conversations are dense with the mysterious jargon of advanced science. So the last thing you'd expect to see there is an office door with a sign reading, "Songwriter in Residence."
Jay Clark is one of five Songwriters in Residence who is moving in and out of NIMBios this year. Each has one month to write two songs that put the scientific experience into words and music.
"A week and a half, two weeks ago, when I told someone about it, they'd look at me like, 'What the hell you going to write?'" says Clark. "My answer would be, "You know, I'm not real sure yet. I'm just hoping it will come to me."
The Songwriter in Residence Program is the brainchild of NIMBios Director Louis Gross. Gross noticed the scientists and mathematicians he works with aren't always that good at communicating their ideas in a concise, accessible way. Moreover, he says most people don't really have the time or patience to wade through complicated explanations of scientific theory. As a result, we don't always have a good sense of what scientists are doing.
"The better that we are at getting the ideas across without going into all the detail that often, people are not that interested in, the better off we are as a nation and as a community of scientists," says Gross.
Songwriters are used to taking complex concepts like love and heartbreak and condensing them into short, easy-to-understand stories — it's how people like Jay Clark make a living. To test out his first stab at a song about the evolutionary process known as sexual selection, Clark dragged one of the NIMBios scientists, Erol Akcay, down to a conference room. Ackay's response was about what you'd expect from a scientist:
"Well, it definitely sounded good," Ackay told Clark. "But you know, from my research, that's kind of an oversimplification of what animals actually do."
That's exactly the kind of scientific critique Clark was looking for. But it doesn't make it any easier to write the song.
"I was trying not to make it completely 100 percent literal," he says. "Not that the average music audience isn't a smart group of people — but you know, this is not my usual type of song."
Akcay understands Clark's dilemma: "There are things that I would like to change about [the song]. But I have to think about how I would change it, how I would say what I want to say in so many verses and make it sound good, and also be comfortable singing it," he says.
And that's the point of the whole program. The scientists watch the songwriters and learn how to make their ideas more accessible. The songwriters watch the scientists unravel the mysteries of the natural world — and then write songs the rest of us can understand. At least, that's how it's supposed to work.
"It's still an experiment," says Ackay. "That's what I like about it." Copyright 2011 WUOT-FM. To see more, visit http://www.wuot.org/.