Now Playing
Connect with Us
Podcasts & RSS Feeds
| All Content |
| RSS |
| View all podcasts & RSS feeds | ||
Planet Money
This Blog Post Costs $3.99
When something costs $3.99, you just round up and tell yourself it costs $4.00. Right?
Maybe not.
A growing body of research suggests that charging, say, $3.99 rather than $4.00 may actually be an effective trick.
In one study, researchers offered people a choice between two different pens.
When the pens were priced at at $2.00 and $3.99, nearly half of the people chose the more expensive pen.
But when the prices changed by a single penny, to $1.99 and $4.00, fewer than 20 percent of people chose the more expensive pen.
Social scientists call this the "left-digit bias" — peoples' tendency to place too much weight on the leftmost digit of a number.
"We have limited time to process stuff, so we take shortcuts," the economist Nicola Lacetera told me.
This makes some sense if something is super cheap — like, say, a pen. But people also exhibit left-digit bias with really expensive things — like, say, used cars.
Lacetera and a couple other economists recently looked at sales data from millions of used cars sold at auction. (Here's the abstract of their paper.)
They found that the price of a car drops significantly when the mileage crosses multiples of 10,000.
For example, cars with 80,000 miles sell for about $210 less, on average, than cars with 79,900 miles.
By comparison, cars with 79,900 miles sell for about $10 less, on average, than cars with 79,800 miles.
This is particularly striking because there's nothing hidden about the number, and because the irrational price jump appears at every 10,000-mile increment up to 100,000 miles.
"The market is so thick and competitive," Lacetera said. "You would expect this to be washed out, and it's not."
This phenomenon — driven, ultimately, by a kind of inattention to numbers — may play out in other spheres as well. For example, Lacetera speculated that students' chances of being admitted to college may jump irrationally as test scores cross big, round-number thresholds.
"We need to pay more attention to inattention," Lacetera said.